A Human-Centered Computing-Based Artificial Intelligence Implementation Strategy to Enhance User Interaction in E-Learning

Authors

  • Naufal Ramadhan Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Meutia Fauzi Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Arif Yunita Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, E-learning, Human-centered computing, User interaction

Abstract

This study aims to analyze an artificial intelligence implementation strategy based on Human-Centered Computing to enhance user interaction in e-learning. The study responds to the growing use of AI in digital learning environments and the need to ensure that AI systems remain transparent, ethical, useful, and aligned with users’ learning needs. This research used a qualitative case study design at a higher education institution in Indonesia that had implemented a Learning Management System with AI-based features, including learning chatbots, automated feedback, material recommendations, and learning analytics. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, limited participatory observation, and documentation. The participants consisted of students, lecturers, e-learning administrators, and information technology staff selected through purposive sampling and expanded through snowball sampling when needed. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal five main themes: perceived usefulness of AI-assisted interaction, trust and transparency in AI feedback, user control and human supervision, digital readiness and institutional support, and the need for more human-centered AI design. These findings show that AI can improve e-learning interaction when it supports real learning tasks, provides understandable feedback, maintains human oversight, and receives adequate institutional support. The study contributes to Human-Centered Computing literature by showing that AI-supported learning interaction is not only a technical issue but also a pedagogical, ethical, and social process. Future research should examine AI-based e-learning across different institutions and learning contexts.

References

Ahmed, S. K. (2025). Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 5, Article 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171

Albayati, H. (2024). Investigating undergraduate students’ perceptions and awareness of using ChatGPT as a regular assistance tool: A user acceptance perspective study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Distefano, M. J., Yang, J. S., & Valliant, J. C. D. (2023). Sample size and saturation: A three-phase method for ethnographic research with multiple qualitative data sources. Field Methods, 36(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X231194515

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4

Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Baah, P. K. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant chatbot on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Hu, W., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2025). From user needs to AI solutions: A human-centered design approach for AI-powered virtual teamwork competency training. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00551-z

Kajiwara, Y., & Kawabata, K. (2024). AI literacy for ethical use of chatbot: Will students accept AI ethics? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100251

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y. S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martínez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074

Le Dinh, T., Le, T. D., Uwizeyemungu, S., & Pelletier, C. (2025). Human-centered artificial intelligence in higher education: A framework for systematic literature reviews. Information, 16(3), Article 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030240

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789

Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9

Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Javed, I., Riaz, S., & Malik, A. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x

Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118

Shuhaiber, A., Kuhail, M. A., & Salman, S. (2025). ChatGPT in higher education: A student’s perspective. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, Article 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100565

Topali, P., Ortega-Arranz, A., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Er, E., Khalil, M., & Akçapınar, G. (2025). Designing human-centered learning analytics and artificial intelligence in education solutions: A systematic literature review. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2345295

Tzirides, A. O., Zapata, G., Kastania, N. P., Saini, A. K., Castro, V., Ismael, S. A., You, Y., Santos, T. A. D., Searsmith, D., O’Brien, C., Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2024). Combining human and artificial intelligence for enhanced AI literacy in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100184

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, Article 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

Wutich, A., Beresford, M., & Bernard, H. R. (2024). Sample sizes for 10 types of qualitative data analysis: An integrative review, empirical guidance, and next steps. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241296206

Yang, S. J. H., Ogata, H., Matsui, T., & Chen, N. S. (2021). Human-centered artificial intelligence in education: Seeing the invisible through the visible. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100008

Yu, C., Yan, C., & Cai, N. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: Factors influencing ChatGPT user satisfaction and continued use intention. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1354929. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1354929

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

A Human-Centered Computing-Based Artificial Intelligence Implementation Strategy to Enhance User Interaction in E-Learning. (2026). Global Journal of Agribusiness, 1(1), 22-31. https://ejournal.globalterasfana.com/gjagb/article/view/86