Developing an Integrative Literary Analysis Model to Examine Global Identity from the Perspectives of Comparative Literature and Digital Humanities

Authors

  • Galih Setiawan Universitas Indonesia Author
  • Putri Hakim Universitas Indonesia Author
  • Yoga Ramadhan Universitas Airlangga Author

Keywords:

Global identity, Digital humanities, Comparative literature, Thematic analysis, Digital literacy

Abstract

This qualitative study investigates how engagement with global literary texts in digital spaces shapes identity construction and interpretative practices among readers and writers. Employing a case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, participatory observation, and documentation of online literary discussions, involving purposively selected participants from active reading communities and online forums. Thematic analysis revealed key themes, including negotiation of identity, interplay between local and global texts, digital literacy, and cognitive-emotional engagement. Findings indicate that digital interaction fosters reflective interpretation, intercultural awareness, and active participation in meaning-making processes. The study contributes theoretically by developing an integrative model combining comparative literature and digital humanities frameworks, and practically by informing digital literary platform design and educational strategies. Implications for policy, pedagogy, and future research include promoting digital literacy, intercultural engagement, and longitudinal investigations into the influence of sustained online literary practices.

References

Ahmed, S. K. (2025). Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, practical applications, and recommendations. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2949916X24001245

Almeida, F. (2026). Thematic analysis in qualitative research: Steps, benefits, and challenges. Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18241378

Appadurai, A. (2020). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002482

Bamman, D., Smith, N. A., & Heuser, R. (2021). A Bayesian mixed effects model of literary character. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22148/16.021

Blevins, C., & Mullen, L. (2022). Challenges in digital textual analysis. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(3), 489-505. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaa068

Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. Advanced Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001

Damrosch, D. (2021). World literature in theory and practice. Annual Review of Comparative and Global Literature, 12(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.507

Hayles, N. K. (2022). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226819657

Jockers, M. L. (2021). Text analysis with R for students of literature. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51833-8

Lim, W. M., et al. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Meydan, H., & Akkaş, H. (2025). Triangulation and domain analysis: Enhancing credibility and depth in qualitative research. KAMBOTI: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 6(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.51135/kambotivol6issue1page33-41

Morehouse, J. (2023). Digital reading practices and identity construction. Journal of Cultural Research, 27(5), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2023.2154897

Moretti, F. (2020). Graphs, maps, trees: Abstract models for a literary history. Verso. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350226020

Mtisi, S. (2022). The qualitative case study research strategy as applied on a rural enterprise development doctoral research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221145849

Ponzanesi, S., & Waller, M. (2021). Postcolonial digital cultures: African experiences. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 57(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2021.1874951

Presner, T. (2021). HyperCities: Thick mapping in the digital humanities. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674987581

Robinson, P. (2021). Comparative literature and globalization. Comparative Literature Studies, 58(4), 750–770. https://doi.org/10.5325/complitstudies.58.4.0750

Siemens, R., & Schreibman, S. (2020). A companion to digital humanities. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605

Underwood, T. (2020). Distant horizons: Digital evidence and literary change. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226642401

Underhill, S. (2024). Reader engagement and digital narrative formation. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/D4811871687

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Developing an Integrative Literary Analysis Model to Examine Global Identity from the Perspectives of Comparative Literature and Digital Humanities. (2026). Global Journal of Literature, 1(1), 31-37. https://ejournal.globalterasfana.com/gjlit/article/view/47