Analysis of Students’ Thinking Processes in Solving Algebraic Problems Using a Computational Approach

Authors

  • Bayu Azzahra Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Sekar Gunawan Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Ridwan Febrianti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Algebraic problem solving, Computational approach, Computational thinking, Students' thinking process

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ thinking processes in solving algebraic problems using a computational approach. The study responds to the problem that many students can follow procedural examples in algebra but still struggle to explain their reasoning, represent unknown quantities, organize solution steps, and evaluate their answers. A qualitative approach with a descriptive case study design was used. The research involved eighth-grade students at a junior high school in Indonesia, with six key informants selected through purposive sampling based on high, medium, and low ability categories. Data were collected through algebraic problem-solving tests, semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, documentation, and field notes. The data were analyzed using an interactive model consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, supported by thematic coding based on computational thinking indicators. The findings reveal five main themes in students’ thinking processes: problem decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, algorithm construction, and solution evaluation. Students with stronger computational thinking were more systematic in identifying information, forming algebraic representations, arranging solution steps, and checking answers. Students with weaker computational thinking tended to rely on surface features, incomplete procedures, and limited evaluation. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the relationship between algebraic thinking and computational thinking. The study implies that teachers need to design algebra learning that emphasizes reasoning processes, strategy explanation, error revision, and reflective evaluation.

References

Abidi, M. H., Cahyono, H., & Susanti, R. D. (2023). Analysis of students’ computational thinking ability in solving contextual problems. Mathematics Education Journal, 7(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v7i2.25041

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, Article 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Ahmed, S. K. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, Article 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198

Bråting, K., & Kilhamn, C. (2021). Exploring the intersection of algebraic and computational thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(2), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1779012

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196

Chytas, C., van Borkulo, S. P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. L. J. (2024). Computational thinking in secondary mathematics education with GeoGebra: Insights from an intervention in calculus lessons. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 10(2), 228–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00141-0

Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), Article 7120. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120

Lee, S. W.-Y., Tu, H.-Y., Chen, G.-L., & Lin, H.-M. (2023). Exploring the multifaceted roles of mathematics learning in predicting students’ computational thinking competency. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00455-2

Lehmann, T. H. (2025). Examining the interaction of computational thinking skills and heuristics in mathematical problem solving. Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2025.2460460

Lv, L., Zhong, B., & Liu, X. (2023). A literature review on the empirical studies of the integration of mathematics and computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 8171–8193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11518-2

Montuori, C., Gambarota, F., Altoè, G., & Arfè, B. (2024). The cognitive effects of computational thinking: A systematic review and meta-analytic study. Computers & Education, 210, Article 104961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104961

Nordby, S. K., Bjerke, A. H., & Mifsud, L. (2022). Computational thinking in the primary mathematics classroom: A systematic review. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8, 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00102-5

Nurwita, F., Kusumah, Y. S., & Priatna, N. (2022). Exploring students’ mathematical computational thinking ability in solving Pythagorean theorem problems. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i2.12496

Rich, K. M., Spaepen, E., Strickland, C., & Moran, C. (2020). Synergies and differences in mathematical and computational thinking: Implications for integrated instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612445

Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A., González-Calero, J. A., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: An experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448

Salwadila, T., & Hapizah, H. (2024). Computational thinking ability in mathematics learning of exponents in grade IX. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p441-456

Sand, O. P., Lockwood, E., Caballero, M. D., & Mørken, K. (2022). Three cases that demonstrate how students connect the domains of mathematics and computing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 67, Article 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100955

Sukowati, B. A., & Masduki, M. (2024). Exploration of students’ computational thinking skills in solving fractional number problems judging from learning style. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 7(2), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v7i2.21878

Utami, N. W., Susandi, A. D., Purwoko, R. Y., Putri, A. A., Ayuningtyas, D., & Irfan, M. (2024). Analysis of students’ computational thinking skills in solving algebraic problems in cultural contexts. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(5), 662–671. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1730

Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O.-L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K–12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Analysis of Students’ Thinking Processes in Solving Algebraic Problems Using a Computational Approach. (2026). Global Journal of Mathematics, 1(1), 9-18. https://ejournal.globalterasfana.com/gjmth/article/view/49