The Relationship Between Digital Disinformation and Political Trust from the Perspective of the Digital Public Sphere in Indonesia
Keywords:
Digital disinformation, Political trust, Digital public sphereAbstract
This study aims to analyze the relationship between digital disinformation and political trust from the perspective of the digital public sphere in Indonesia. The issue is important because political communication increasingly takes place on social media, where citizens encounter political claims, hoaxes, partisan narratives, and fact-checking responses in the same digital environment. This study uses a qualitative case study approach conducted in Jakarta, Bandung, Yogyakarta, Surabaya, and Makassar from June to August 2025. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 30 informants, digital observation of public political discussions on TikTok, Instagram, X, Facebook, YouTube, and WhatsApp-based communities, and documentation of fact-checking articles, news reports, public posts, and official clarifications. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis with the support of NVivo 14. The findings reveal four main themes: perceived disinformation as political noise, trust negotiation through source evaluation, emotional responses and political identity, and the weakening of deliberation in the digital public sphere. The study shows that disinformation does not only distort facts, but also shapes how citizens interpret political actors, institutions, media, and democratic processes. The study concludes that political trust in Indonesia’s digital public sphere is selective, conditional, and strongly influenced by the quality of public communication, digital literacy, and platform dynamics. Future research should examine platform-specific patterns and compare citizens’ experiences across different social and regional contexts
References
Arum, Y. N. (2024). The influence of information sharing behaviour on the spread of political hoaxes in the 2024 election. Persepsi: Communication Journal.
Bauer, P. C., & Clemm von Hohenberg, B. (2021). Believing and sharing information by fake sources: An experiment. Political Communication, 38(6), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1840462
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Buchanan, T. (2021). Trust, personality, and belief as determinants of the organic reach of political disinformation on social media. The Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1975085
Effendi, E. (2023). User behaviour and hoax information on social media: Case of Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v7i3.7402
Freelon, D., & Wells, C. (2020). Disinformation as political communication. Political Communication, 37(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755
Hafel, M. (2023). Digital transformation in politics and governance in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges in the era of technological disruption. Society, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i2.577
Hameleers, M., Powell, T. E., Van Der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Bos, L. (2020). A picture paints a thousand lies? The effects and mechanisms of multimodal disinformation and rebuttals disseminated via social media. Political Communication, 37(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1674979
Hasan, K. (2024). Political public space in the 2024 election social media contestation. Proceedings of ICOSPOLHUM.
Hutajulu, N. L. (2023). The influence of social media and trust in institutions on digital participation in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Public Administration Research.
Juditha, C. (2024). Komunikasi politik terkait hoaks pada Pemilu Presiden 2024. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media.
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Lee, A. (2020). Online hoaxes, existential threat, and internet shutdown in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities.
Lee, F. L. F. (2024). Disinformation perceptions and media trust: The moderating roles of political trust and values. International Journal of Communication, 18, 1–23.
Lukavská, K., et al. (2025). Exploring disinformation: The interplay of exposure, trust, and sharing. Internet Interventions.
Luthfia, A., Muslikhin, Prahassacitta, V., Wahyuningtyas, B. P., & Condrobimo, A. R. (2025). Debunking technology and efforts in combating dis/misinformation. International Conference Proceeding. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM64595.2025.10857576
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Ognyanova, K., Lazer, D., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2020). Misinformation in action: Fake news exposure is linked to lower trust in media, higher trust in government when your side is in power. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-024
Sakti, R. E. (2022). Understanding the role of social media toward satisfaction with government performance in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 12(1).
Sarjito, A. (2024). Hoaks, disinformasi, dan ketahanan nasional: Ancaman teknologi informasi dalam masyarakat digital Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Local Politics, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v6i2.1547
Subekti, D. (2025). Social media and disinformation for candidates. Frontiers in Political Science.
Tarore, S. V. (2025). Analysis of the role of social media in shaping public trust in local government. IAPA Proceedings Conference.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




