An Integrative Data-Driven Precision Livestock Farming Model to Improve the Efficiency and Sustainability of Livestock Production Systems
Keywords:
Data-Driven Decision-Making, Digital Livestock Farming, Livestock Sustainability, Precision Livestock Farming, Socio-Technical SystemAbstract
This study aims to explore how an integrative data-driven Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) model can improve the efficiency and sustainability of livestock production systems. The study addresses the growing need for livestock farms to integrate digital data, animal monitoring technologies, and managerial decision-making in response to productivity, welfare, and environmental challenges. A qualitative exploratory case study design was used to examine PLF implementation in livestock production units that had adopted or tested digital tools, such as animal health sensors, feed recording applications, barn monitoring systems, and production databases. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, field observation, and documentation involving farmers, farm managers, veterinarians, livestock extension workers, technology operators, and digital system developers. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns of meaning related to data use, adoption barriers, and sustainability practices. The findings reveal three main patterns: data as a new basis for decision-making, socio-technical barriers in PLF adoption, and PLF as a pathway to efficiency and sustainability. The study shows that PLF becomes effective when digital data are combined with farmers’ experiential knowledge, supported by trust, user capacity, reliable infrastructure, and clear data governance. These findings contribute to PLF literature by framing digital livestock management as a socio-technical process rather than a purely technological intervention. The study implies that policy and practice should support inclusive, practical, and context-sensitive PLF adoption. Future research should test the proposed model across different livestock systems and farm scales.
References
Akinyemi, B. E., Vigors, B., Turner, S. P., Akaichi, F., Benjamin, M., Johnson, A. K., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Rozeboom, D. W., Steibel, J. P., Thompson, D. P., Zangaro, C., & Siegford, J. M. (2023). Precision livestock farming: A qualitative exploration of swine industry stakeholders. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4, Article 1150528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1150528
Akinyemi, B. E., Siegford, J. M., Jessiman, L. J. J., Turner, S. P., Johnson, A. K., & Akaichi, F. (2025). Precision livestock farming usage among a subset of U.S. swine producers: Insights through a structural equation modeling approach. Smart Agricultural Technology, 10, Article 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100839
Bernabucci, G., Evangelista, C., Girotti, P., Viola, P., Spina, R., Ronchi, B., Basiricò, L., Turini, L., Mantino, A., Mele, M., & Primi, R. (2025). Precision livestock farming: An overview on the application in extensive systems. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 24(1), 859–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2025.2480821
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines. Palliative Medicine, 38(6), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241234800
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Krampe, C., Ingenbleek, P. T. M., Niemi, J. K., & Serratosa, J. (2024). Designing precision livestock farming system innovations: A farmer perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 111, Article 103397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103397
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Losacco, C., Pugliese, G., Forte, L., Tufarelli, V., Maggiolino, A., & De Palo, P. (2025). Digital transition as a driver for sustainable tailor-made farm management: An up-to-date overview on precision livestock farming. Agriculture, 15(13), Article 1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15131383
McKim, C. (2023). Meaningful member-checking: A structured approach to member-checking. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12973
Niloofar, P., Francis, D. P., Lazarova-Molnar, S., Vulpe, A., Vochin, M.-C., Suciu, G., Balanescu, M., Anestis, V., & Bartzanas, T. (2021). Data-driven decision support in livestock farming for improved animal health, welfare and greenhouse gas emissions: Overview and challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 190, Article 106406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106406
Nsabiyeze, A., Zhang, M., Li, J., Zhao, Q., & Zhang, X. (2025). Precision livestock farming for climate-resilient livestock management: A review of real-time monitoring and decision support systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 524, Article 146454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146454
Papakonstantinou, G. I., Voulgarakis, N., Terzidou, G., Fotos, L., Giamouri, E., & Papatsiros, V. G. (2024). Precision livestock farming technology: Applications and challenges of animal welfare and climate change. Agriculture, 14(4), Article 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040620
Selvaggi, R., Lusk, J. L., & Pappalardo, G. (2025). Eliciting dairy farmers’ willingness to pay for digital devices for precision livestock farming. Journal of Rural Studies, 119, Article 103772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103772
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




