Strategies for Integrating Green Chemistry Principles into Data-Driven Synthesis of Functional Materials
Keywords:
Green chemistry, Data-driven synthesis, Functional materials, Materials informatics, Sustainable laboratory practiceAbstract
This study aims to explore strategies for integrating green chemistry principles into the data-driven synthesis of functional materials, focusing on how researchers understand, negotiate, and apply sustainability considerations in laboratory practice. The study used a qualitative exploratory case study design involving researchers, lecturers, postgraduate students, laboratory analysts, and research managers in functional materials laboratories. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, non-participant observation, and documentation of laboratory procedures, synthesis records, safety documents, and research reports. The data were analyzed using reflective thematic analysis to identify patterns of meaning related to green chemistry integration, data use, synthesis optimization, and laboratory decision-making. The findings reveal six main themes: the practical embedding of green chemistry in laboratory routines, the role of data-driven methods in reducing experimental uncertainty, the tension between material performance and environmental responsibility, the limited integration of sustainability indicators into predictive models, the influence of laboratory culture and institutional support, and the importance of documenting failed experiments for greener synthesis pathways. This study contributes to the literature by positioning data-driven synthesis as a socio-technical process that requires technical, institutional, and educational integration. The findings imply that laboratories need to connect performance data with safety, waste, solvent, and energy indicators to support more sustainable material discovery. Future research should develop measurable green chemistry indicators for machine learning models and compare implementation practices across different institutional contexts.
References
propelled by machine learning. Nature Reviews Materials, 6, 655–678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and becoming a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Burger, B., Maffettone, P. M., Gusev, V. V., Aitchison, C. M., Bai, Y., Wang, X., Li, X., Alston, B. M., Li, B., Clowes, R., Rankin, N., Harris, B., Sprick, R. S., & Cooper, A. I. (2020). A mobile robotic chemist. Nature, 583(7815), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2442-2
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Deng, R., Gao, M., Zhang, B., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Solvent-mediated synthesis of functional powder materials from deep eutectic solvents for energy storage and conversion: A review. Advanced Energy Materials, 14(8), Article 2303707. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202303707
Fantke, P., Cinquemani, C., Yaseneva, P., De Mello, J., Schwabe, H., Ebeling, B., & Lapkin, A. A. (2021). Transition to sustainable chemistry through digitalization. Chem, 7(11), 2866–2882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2021.09.012
Hardian, R., Liang, Z., Zhang, X., & Szekely, G. (2020). Artificial intelligence: The silver bullet for sustainable materials development. Green Chemistry, 22(21), 7521–7528. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC02956D
Hung, L., Yager, J. A., Monteverde, D., Baiocchi, D., Kwon, H., Sun, S., & Suram, S. (2024). Autonomous laboratories for accelerated materials discovery: A community survey and practical insights. Digital Discovery, 3(7), 1273–1279. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4DD00059E
Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), Article 7120. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120
LaDonna, K. A., Artino, A. R., Jr., & Balmer, D. F. (2021). Beyond the guise of saturation: Rigor and qualitative interview data. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 13(5), 607–611. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-21-00752.1
Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890
Lu, B., Xia, Y., Ren, Y., Xie, M., Zhou, L., Vinai, G., Morton, S. A., Wee, A. T. S., van der Wiel, W. G., Zhang, W., & Wong, P. K. J. (2024). When machine learning meets 2D materials: A review. Advanced Science, 11(13), Article 2305277. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202305277
Ma, Y., Yang, Y., Li, T., Hussain, S., & Zhu, M. (2024). Deep eutectic solvents as an emerging green platform for the synthesis of functional materials. Green Chemistry, 26(7), 3627–3669. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3GC04289H
Moosavi, S. M., Jablonka, K. M., & Smit, B. (2020). The role of machine learning in the understanding and design of materials. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 142(48), 20273–20287. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c09105
Mtisi, S. (2022). The qualitative case study research strategy as applied on a rural enterprise development doctoral research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221145849
Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
Shields, B. J., Stevens, J., Li, J., Parasram, M., Damani, F., Alvarado, J. I. M., Janey, J. M., Adams, R. P., & Doyle, A. G. (2021). Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature, 590(7844), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03213-y
Szymanski, N. J., Rendy, B., Fei, Y., Kumar, R. E., He, T., Milsted, D., McDermott, M. J., Gallant, M., Cubuk, E. D., Merchant, A., Kim, H., Jain, A., Bartel, C. J., Persson, K. A., Zeng, Y., & Ceder, G. (2023). An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of inorganic materials. Nature, 624(7990), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06734-w
Wang, A. Y. T., Murdock, R. J., Kauwe, S. K., Oliynyk, A. O., Gurlo, A., Brgoch, J., Persson, K. A., & Sparks, T. D. (2020). Machine learning for materials scientists: An introductory guide toward best practices. Chemistry of Materials, 32(12), 4954–4965. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01907
Wang, Z., Sun, Z., Yin, H., Liu, X., Wang, J., Zhao, H., Pang, C. H., Wu, T., Li, S., Yin, Z., & Yu, X. F. (2022). Data-driven materials innovation and applications. Advanced Materials, 34(36), Article 2104113. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202104113
Yao, Z., Lum, Y., Johnston, A., Mejia-Mendoza, L. M., Zhou, X., Wen, Y., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Sargent, E. H., & Seh, Z. W. (2023). Machine learning for a sustainable energy future. Nature Reviews Materials, 8(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00490-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




