Audience perceptions of message credibility on social media platforms

Authors

  • Nabila Putri Universitas Negeri Surabaya Author
  • Rudi Hidayat Universitas Negeri Surabaya Author
  • Fitri Saputra Universitas Diponegoro Author

Keywords:

Audience, Message Credibility, Social Media, Digital Literacy

Abstract

This study aims to explore audience perceptions of message credibility on social media platforms. This phenomenon is important to examine because social media has become a primary source of public information, yet it also serves as a space for the spread of misinformation and disinformation that influences how audiences assess the truthfulness of messages. This study employs a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design to understand audiences’ subjective experiences in evaluating, trusting, doubting, and verifying messages on social media. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, limited digital observation, and documentation of 12–20 active social media users selected using purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Data analysis was conducted thematically through the processes of data condensation, categorization, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study revealed four main themes: source credibility as the initial basis of trust, message packaging as an indicator of trustworthiness, digital social validation through user comments and interactions, and the audience’s informal verification strategies. These findings indicate that the credibility of messages on social media is not only determined by the content of the message but is also shaped through interactions between the source, the presentation of the message, the platform, social responses, and the audience’s personal experiences. This study contributes to digital communication research by positioning the audience as an active subject in the process of interpreting information credibility. The research implications emphasize the importance of digital literacy, which encompasses the ability to evaluate sources, interpret visual cues, understand the influence of social interactions, and critically verify information.

References

Alanazi, N. A., Almoajel, A. M., Tharkar, S., & Almutairi, K. (2025). Perceptions of executive decision makers on using social media in effective health communication: Qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e69269. https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e69269/

Bathran, C., & Samuel, A. J. (2024). A phenomenological qualitative study protocol and semi-structured interview guide development to identify perceptions, experiences, facilitators and inhibitors. Musculoskeletal Care. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70001

Cai, Y., Kamarudin, S., & Nujaimi, S. (2025). Willingness to share information on social media: A systematic literature review (2020–2024). Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1567506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567506

Chang, L., Li, W., Xin, X., & Wang, J. (2024). Strategies for assessing health information credibility among older social media users in China: A qualitative study. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2288372

Gherguț-Babii, A. N., Poleac, G., & Obadă, D. R. (2025). In the disinformation era: A qualitative study exploring Generation Z’s perception of civic engagement and their vulnerability to online fake news. Journalism and Media, 6(3), 136. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/6/3/136

Janis, I. (2022). Strategies for establishing dependability between two qualitative intrinsic case studies: A reflexive thematic analysis. Field Methods, 34(3), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X211069636

Kaur, K., & Gupta, S. (2023). Towards dissemination, detection and combating misinformation on social media: A literature review. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(8), 1656–1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2022-0066

Kisa, S., & Kisa, A. (2024). A comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 misinformation, public health impacts, and communication strategies: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e56931. https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e56931/

Lamba, N., & Van Tonder, A. (2022). Unpacking qualitative methodology to explore experiences of mothers with children with autism spectrum disorder in the UAE: A thematic analysis inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221110295

Lawson, B. T., Chadwick, A., Hall, N. A., & Vaccari, C. (2025). The trustworthiness of peers and public discourse: Exploring how people navigate numerical dis/misinformation on personal messaging platforms. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2400141

Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

McGill, A., McCloskey, R., Smith, D., & Wong, G. (2023). Establishing trustworthiness in health care process modelling: A practical guide to quality enhancement in studies using the functional resonance analysis method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183616

Mishra, A., Malik, N., & Shukla, A. (2024). Decoding individual motivations and responses to misinformation: Insights from thematic analysis. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 18(6), 1083–1103. https://www.emerald.com/jrim/article/18/6/1083/1235112

Núñez-Mussa, E., Riquelme, A., & Valenzuela, S. (2025). The threat of misinformation on journalism’s epistemology: Exploring the gap between journalists’ and audiences’ expectations when facing fake content. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2320249

Salmona, M., & Kaczynski, D. (2024). Qualitative data analysis strategies. In How to conduct qualitative research in finance. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/

Sathianathan, S., & Mhd Ali, A. (2025). How the general public navigates health misinformation on social media: Qualitative study of identification and response approaches. JMIR Infodemiology, 5, e67464. https://infodemiology.jmir.org/2025/1/e67464

Scannell, D., Desens, L., Guadagno, M., & Tra, Y. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine discourse on Twitter: A content analysis of persuasion techniques, sentiment and mis/disinformation. Journal of Health Communication, 26(7), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1955050

Tong, J. (2024). From content to context: A qualitative case study of factors influencing audience perception of the trustworthiness of COVID-19 data visualisations in UK newspaper coverage. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231190725

Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: Using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication, 37(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Audience perceptions of message credibility on social media platforms. (2026). Global Journal of Communication Science, 1(1), 33-42. https://ejournal.globalterasfana.com/gjcom/article/view/31