A User Experience-Based Digital Transformation Model for Improving the Quality of Academic Library Services

Authors

  • Wahyu Yunita Universitas Indonesia Author
  • Yulia Puspitasari Universitas Indonesia Author
  • Farhan Azzahra Universitas Diponegoro Author

Keywords:

Academic library, Digital transformation, Library service quality, User experience

Abstract

This study aims to develop a user experience-based digital transformation model for improving the quality of academic library services. The research responds to the growing need for academic libraries to provide digital services that are accessible, usable, responsive, and aligned with the academic needs of students and lecturers. This study used a qualitative case study approach at the Library of Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia, from October to December 2025. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, non-participant observation, and documentation. The participants consisted of 12 students, 4 lecturers, 4 librarians, and 2 library information technology staff selected through purposive sampling. The data were analysed using thematic analysis through coding, categorisation, and theme development. The findings reveal five main themes: digital access as academic convenience, user experience gaps in service navigation, librarian support as a bridge between users and technology, digital literacy as a condition for service effectiveness, and the need for an integrated user experience-based service model. The study shows that digital transformation cannot be reduced to system development alone. It must connect technology, human support, user education, service integration, and continuous feedback. The findings contribute to digital transformation theory by placing user experience at the centre of academic library service quality. Practically, the study recommends that academic libraries simplify service interfaces, strengthen digital literacy programs, improve librarian support, and develop user-based service evaluation mechanisms.

References

Adarkwah, M. A., Okagbue, E. F., Oladipo, O. A., Mekonen, Y. K., Anulika, A. G., Nchekwubemchukwu, I. S., Okafor, M. U., Chineta, O. M., Muhideen, S., & Islam, A. Y. M. A. (2024). Exploring the transformative journey of academic libraries in Africa before and after COVID-19 and in the generative AI era. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(4), 102900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102900

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Asim, M., Arif, M., Rafiq, M., & Ahmad, R. (2023). Investigating applications of artificial intelligence in university libraries of Pakistan: An empirical study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6), 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102803

Barfi, K. A., Parbie, S. K., Filson, C. K., Teye, M. V., Kodua-Ntim, K., & Ayensu, E. (2023). Assessing the quality of services at an academic library. Heliyon, 9(12), e22449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22449

Barifah, M., Landoni, M., & Eddakrouri, A. (2020). Evaluating the user experience in a digital library. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e280. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.280

Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Cox, A. (2022). Factors shaping future use and design of academic library space. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 28(3), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2039244

Eshbach, B. E. (2020). Supporting and engaging students through academic library programming. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(3), 102129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102129

Foster, S., Wilson, D., Sanders, S., & Johnson, J. (2023). The user experience: Student perspectives on library course reserve. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(2), 102635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102635

Huang, Y., Cox, A. M., & Cox, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in academic library strategy in the United Kingdom and the Mainland of China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6), 102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102772

Kalota, F., Boamah, B. F., Allam, H., Schisler, T., & Witty, G. (2025). Beyond books: Student perspectives on emerging technologies, usability, and ethics in the library of the future. Publications, 13(3), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13030032

Khoeini, S., Noruzi, A., Naghshineh, N., & Sheikhshoaei, F. (2024). Developing a model of digital transformation of university libraries based on meta-synthesis. The Electronic Library, 42(4), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-02-2024-0046

Khoeini, S., Noruzi, A., Naghshineh, N., & Sheikhshoaei, F. (2025). Designing the digital transformation model of public university libraries in Iran based on Delphi method. Digital Library Perspectives, 41(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-06-2024-0100

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Kullman, S. M. (2025). Participatory member checking: A novel approach for increasing trustworthiness in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251321211

Kushnir, I. (2025). Thematic analysis in the area of education: A practical guide. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2471645. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2471645

Lu, Y., & Lin, S. (2025). How can we promote digital transformation in college libraries? A study on readers’ intention to adopt digital services. Sustainability, 17(8), 3504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083504

Mirza, K. B., & Jabeen, M. (2025). University library leaders’ technological initiatives for reshaping reading habits in the digital era: A twin cities case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(3), 103038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103038

Muslim, S. A. (2024). Assessing the impact of digital transformation on access, user experience, and knowledge management in academic libraries. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Educational Study, 5(3), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamres.v5i3.547

Nasution, C. F., & Zulaikha, S. R. (2023). Penggunaan konsep user experience terhadap layanan situs web Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Pustaka Budaya, 10(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.31849/pb.v10i2.14683

Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2025). Ensuring validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 28(4), 206–208. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2024-104232

Okunlaya, R. O., Abdullah, N. S., & Alias, R. A. (2022). Artificial intelligence library services innovative conceptual framework for the digital transformation of university education. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1869–1892. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2021-0242

Rabelo, C. A., Teixeira, J. G., & Mendes, G. H. S. (2024). Student experience in academic libraries: Analysis of intellectual structure and opportunities for future research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(3), 102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102878

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

A User Experience-Based Digital Transformation Model for Improving the Quality of Academic Library Services. (2026). Global Journal of Library and Archival Information Science, 1(1), 1-10. https://ejournal.globalterasfana.com/gjlais/article/view/123