Digital Transformation in Primary Health Care: Analysis of Barriers and Effective Implementation Strategies

Dwi Febrianti; Rika Ningsih; Yusuf Permadi

Authors

Dwi Febrianti Universitas Gadjah Mada Author
Rika Ningsih Universitas Gadjah Mada Author
Yusuf Permadi Universitas Airlangga Author

Keywords:

Digital transformation, Primary health care, Implementation barriers, Digital health, Health service innovation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the barriers and effective implementation strategies of digital transformation in primary health care. The study focuses on how health workers, facility managers, administrative staff, information technology staff, and patients experience the use of digital systems in daily service delivery. A qualitative approach with a descriptive case study design was used. The research was conducted in five primary health care facilities in Bandar Lampung City, Indonesia, from July to September 2026. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, non-participant observation, and document review involving 30 participants selected through purposive sampling and limited snowball sampling. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis supported by data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal six main themes: infrastructure readiness, workflow disruption, digital literacy gaps, interoperability problems, data security and user trust, and local adaptation strategies. The study shows that digital transformation in primary health care is not merely a matter of technology adoption, but a socio-technical process that depends on organizational readiness, user capacity, service culture, and policy support. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of digital health implementation by highlighting the role of local adaptation in maintaining service continuity. This study implies that effective digital transformation requires continuous training, integrated platforms, clear data governance, patient assistance, and phased implementation based on facility readiness.

References

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198

Aisyah, D. N., Setiawan, A. H., Lokopessy, A. F., Faradiba, N., Setiaji, S., Manikam, L., & Kozlakidis, Z. (2024). The information and communication technology maturity assessment at primary health care services across 9 provinces in Indonesia: Evaluation study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 12, e55959. https://doi.org/10.2196/55959

Alzghaibi, H., & Hutchings, H. A. (2025). Barriers to the implementation of large-scale electronic health record systems in primary healthcare centers: A mixed-methods study in Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, 1516714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1516714

Borges do Nascimento, I. J., Abdulazeem, H., Vasanthan, L. T., Martinez, E. Z., Zucoloto, M. L., Østengaard, L., Azzopardi-Muscat, N., Zapata, T., & Novillo-Ortiz, D. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234

El Asmar, M. L., Dharmayat, K. I., Vallejo-Vaz, A. J., Irwin, R., & Mastellos, N. (2021). Effect of computerised, knowledge-based, clinical decision support systems on patient-reported and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic disease managed in primary care settings: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 11(12), e054659. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054659

Erku, D., Khatri, R., Endalamaw, A., Wolka, E., Nigatu, F., Zewdie, A., & Assefa, Y. (2023). Digital health interventions to improve access to and quality of primary health care services: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(19), 6854. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20196854

Fava, V. M. D., & Lapão, L. V. (2024). Provision of digital primary health care services: Overview of reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e53594. https://doi.org/10.2196/53594

Frennert, S., Rydenfält, C., Muhic, M., & Erlingsdóttir, G. (2024). Unveiling the heterogeneous utilisation of the same digital patient management platform: Case studies in primary healthcare in Sweden. BMC Health Services Research, 24, 831. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11287-3

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076

Harahap, N. C., Handayani, P. W., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2022). Barriers and facilitators of personal health record adoption in Indonesia: Health facilities’ perspectives. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 162, 104750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104750

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Jonnagaddala, J., Godinho, M. A., & Liaw, S.-T. (2021). From telehealth to virtual primary care in Australia? A rapid scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 151, 104470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104470

Okeke, E. B., Forman, D., Taylor, E., Hyde, E., Parente, F., Kanmodi, K. K., & Wordsworth, S. (2025). Barriers and facilitators to digital health adoption: A thematic analysis of healthcare professionals’ perspectives in rural Oyo State, Nigeria. BMC Digital Health, 3, 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-025-00227-8

Pagliari, C. (2021). Digital health and primary care: Past, pandemic and prospects. Journal of Global Health, 11, 01005. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.01005

Peyroteo, M., Ferreira, I. A., Elvas, L. B., Ferreira, J. C., & Lapão, L. V. (2021). Remote monitoring systems for patients with chronic diseases in primary health care: Systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9(12), e28285. https://doi.org/10.2196/28285

Rabet, R., Bagree, E., Salam, Z., & Wahoush, O. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to digital primary health care access in immigrant and refugee populations: A scoping review. Journal of Public Health, 33, 2279–2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02193-3

Sibbald, S. L., Paciocco, S., Fournie, M., Van Asseldonk, R., & Scurr, T. (2021). Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research. Healthcare Management Forum, 34(5), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704211028857

van Tilburg, M. L., de Jong, C. C., van der Steen, J. T., & Achterberg, W. P. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital health services in primary care: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e49868. https://doi.org/10.2196/49868

Willis, V. C., Thomas Craig, K. J., Jabbarpour, Y., Scheufele, E. L., Arriaga, Y. E., Ajinkya, M., Rhee, K. B., & Bazemore, A. (2022). Digital health interventions to enhance prevention in primary care: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 10(1), e33518. https://doi.org/10.2196/33518