An Integrative Approach Combining Computational Physics and Machine Learning in Complex Nonlinear Systems

Authors

  • Maya Rohman Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Nadia Iskandar Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Rizki Yulianto Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Computational physics, Machine learning, Complex nonlinear systems, Scientific machine learning

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the integrative approach that combines computational physics and machine learning in understanding complex nonlinear systems. The issue examined in this study concerns how researchers build, validate, and interpret computational models that rely on both physical laws and data-driven learning. This study employed a qualitative exploratory case study design involving researchers, lecturers, postgraduate students, and computational practitioners with experience in computational physics, dynamical systems, machine learning, or scientific machine learning. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, limited observation, and documentation of modeling workflows, simulation records, algorithmic notes, and research reports. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings identified five main themes: integrative modeling as a response to nonlinear complexity, negotiation between physical laws and data-driven patterns, validation as a layered scientific process, institutional and technical conditions shaping model development, and scientific responsibility in relation to interpretability and transparency. These findings show that the integration of computational physics and machine learning is not merely a technical procedure, but an interdisciplinary knowledge practice involving theory, data, algorithms, uncertainty, and human judgment. The study contributes to the qualitative understanding of scientific machine learning by emphasizing the role of physical coherence, layered validation, and responsible interpretation in complex nonlinear systems. The findings imply that researchers, institutions, and policymakers need to strengthen transparent modeling practices, interdisciplinary training, computational infrastructure, and ethical standards for using machine learning in scientific inquiry.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Cortiella, A., Park, K. C., & Doostan, A. (2021). Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems via reweighted l1-regularized least squares. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 376, 113620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113620

Cuomo, S., Schiano Di Cola, V., Giampaolo, F., Rozza, G., Raissi, M., & Piccialli, F. (2022). Scientific machine learning through physics-informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next. Journal of Scientific Computing, 92, Article 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z

de Silva, B. M., Champion, K., Quade, M., Loiseau, J.-C., Kutz, J. N., & Brunton, S. L. (2020). PySINDy: A Python package for the sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems from data. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(49), 2104. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02104

Haghighat, E., & Juanes, R. (2021). SciANN: A Keras/TensorFlow wrapper for scientific computations and physics-informed deep learning using artificial neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 373, 113552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113552

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Huang, Y., Kuehn, C., & Schöll, E. (2024). Deep learning for predicting rate-induced tipping. Nature Machine Intelligence, 6, 1136–1148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00937-0

Jagtap, A. D., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2020). Extended physics-informed neural networks: A generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations. Communications in Computational Physics, 28(5), 2002–2041. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2020-0164

Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 7120. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120

Kaheman, K., Kutz, J. N., & Brunton, S. L. (2020). SINDy-PI: A robust algorithm for parallel implicit sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 476(2242), 20200279. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0279

Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Linka, K., Schäfer, A., Meng, X., Zou, Z., Karniadakis, G. E., & Kuhl, E. (2022). Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for real-world nonlinear dynamical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 402, 115346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115346

Lu, L., Jin, P., Pang, G., Zhang, Z., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021). Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(3), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00302-5

Lu, L., Meng, X., Mao, Z., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021). DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations. SIAM Review, 63(1), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1274067

Panahi, S., Kong, L.-W., Moradi, M., Zhai, Z.-M., Glaz, B., Haile, M., & Lai, Y.-C. (2024). Machine learning prediction of tipping in complex dynamical systems. Physical Review Research, 6(4), 043194. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043194

Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318

Yu, J., Lu, L., Meng, X., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2022). Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 393, 114823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.114823

Zhang, L., Liu, J., & Wang, H. (2023). Physics-informed machine learning for computational mechanics: A review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30, 4493–4526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09929-4

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

An Integrative Approach Combining Computational Physics and Machine Learning in Complex Nonlinear Systems. (2026). Global Journal of Physics, 1(1), 29-40. https://ejournal.globalterasfana.com/gjphy/article/view/61