The Application of Statistical Learning and Machine Learning in Supporting Organizational Strategic Decision-Making
Keywords:
Statistical learning, Machine learning, Strategic decision-making, Data-driven decision-making, Human-ai collaborationAbstract
This study aims to explore how statistical learning and machine learning support organizational strategic decision-making, with a focus on how organizational actors interpret, trust, and use algorithmic outputs in strategic contexts. The study used a qualitative case study approach because the research examined meanings, experiences, and decision processes within real organizational settings. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, non-participant observation, and document analysis involving senior managers, strategic planning officers, data analysts, IT managers, and operational decision-makers from selected organizations that had applied predictive analytics, dashboards, or machine learning-based decision support tools. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings reveal four main themes: data as a strategic language, trust and interpretation of model outputs, negotiation between human judgment and algorithmic recommendation, and organizational readiness for data-driven decision-making. The study shows that statistical learning and machine learning improve strategic decision-making when organizations combine analytical capability with human interpretation, transparent communication, and collaborative decision routines. These findings contribute to the literature on data-driven decision-making, dynamic capabilities, and human-AI collaboration by showing that machine learning creates strategic value through socio-technical interaction rather than technical accuracy alone. The study implies that organizations need stronger data governance, data literacy, explainability mechanisms, and ethical guidelines to support responsible and effective use of machine learning in strategic decisions.
References
Awan, U., Shamim, S., Khan, Z., Zia, N. U., Shariq, S. M., & Khan, M. N. (2021). Big data analytics capability and decision-making: The role of data driven insight on circular economy performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120766
Ayre, J., & McCaffery, K. J. (2022). Research note: Thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Physiotherapy, 68(1), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2021.11.002
Aysolmaz, B., Müller, R., & Meacham, D. (2023). The public perceptions of algorithmic decision-making systems: Results from a large-scale survey. Telematics and Informatics, 79, 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.101954
Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433–1450. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16274
Borges, A. F. S., Laurindo, F. J. B., Spínola, M. M., Gonçalves, R. F., & Mattos, C. A. (2021). The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102225
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Gupta, S., Sivarajah, U., & Bag, S. (2023). Assessing the impact of big data analytics on decision-making processes, forecasting, and performance of a firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122824
Christou, P. A. (2023). How to use thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Tourism, 3(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.4337/jqrt.2023.0006
Csaszar, F. A., Ketkar, H., & Kim, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence and strategic decision-making: Evidence from entrepreneurs and investors. Strategy Science, 9(4), 322–345. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2024.0190
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence and business value: A literature review. Information Systems Frontiers, 24, 1709–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w
Guedes, L., & Oliveira Júnior, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: A case study. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 16(1), e860. https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2024.v16i1.860
Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 7120. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120
Kitsios, F., & Kamariotou, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence and business strategy towards digital transformation: A research agenda. Sustainability, 13(4), 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042025
Li, L., Lin, J., Ouyang, Y., & Luo, X. (2022). Evaluating the impact of big data analytics usage on the decision-making quality of organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121355
Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information & Management, 57(2), 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004
Neumann, O., Guirguis, K., & Steiner, R. (2024). Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: A comparative case study. Public Management Review, 26(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685
Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
Puranam, P. (2021). Human-AI collaborative decision-making as an organization design problem. Journal of Organization Design, 10, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-021-00095-2
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Ram, J., & Desgourdes, C. (2024). Using big data analytics for improving decision-making performance in projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 74, 101849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101849
Sarker, I. H. (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Computer Science, 2, 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x
Sturm, T., Pumplun, L., Gerlach, J. P., Kowalczyk, M., & Buxmann, P. (2023). Machine learning advice in managerial decision-making: The overlooked role of decision makers’ advice utilization. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 32(4), 101790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101790
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Ramadhan, Budi Fauzi, Citra Yunita (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




